Enterprise compliance software the board can stand behind

Enterprise compliance software gets bought by whoever answers to the board when a rule change is missed: the CCO, the CISO, the General Counsel, the VP Risk. This page is the honest version of that conversation: what the enterprise plan is designed to guarantee, what it costs to get wrong, and how to talk to us before launch.

The three questions the board actually asks

§ 12.1

Did we know?

Every relevant change surfaces the day it is published, in language a director reads without counsel present. Ignorance stops being the failure mode.

§ 12.2

What did we do?

The gap check, the drafted update, the approval, the control change: one thread, attributable, dated. The answer exists before the question is asked.

§ 12.3

Can we prove it?

The audit trail is append-only and exportable: for the auditor, the examiner, the regulator, or the board pack, without a quarter of evidence assembly.

§ 13 Enterprise scope · planned

What the Enterprise agreement includes

Everything in Scale, plus the controls your security and procurement teams will ask about before anything touches your data. All of it is planned scope, stated now so the security review can start early. If you are mapping this against an existing stack, the GRC software and enterprise risk management software pages cover where the register sits.

Ready to talk? Write to team@complianceofficer.ai or request access with your company name and we reply within two business days.

§ 01 SSO / SAML, SCIM provisioning
§ 02 Role-based access control
§ 03 SLA with response commitments
§ 04 Security review and DPA
§ 05 Data residency options
§ 06 Invoicing, procurement, custom terms
§ 07 Custom regulatory regimes
§ 08 All of the above planned for launch

§ 14 The exposure math

What getting it wrong costs, on the public record

GDPR authorities can fine up to 4 percent of global annual turnover for the severe tier. BSA/AML failures carry civil money penalties and, for individuals, criminal exposure. SOX section 906 certifications carry personal liability for the officers signing. Against those numbers, the platform's planned top tier is a rounding error, which is the point. The SOX figures are not abstract: under 18 U.S.C. 1350, a knowing false certification carries up to $1,000,000 and 10 years, and a willful one up to $5,000,000 and 20 years. Our SOX compliance guide sets out which sections reach a company at your filer status.

§ 01 GDPR Art. 83(5) up to 4% of global turnover
§ 02 BSA/AML violations civil penalties, criminal exposure
§ 03 SOX certifications personal officer liability
§ 04 Scale tier, for comparison $17,988/yr planned

§ 113 Multi-entity scope

How multi-entity and multi-framework scope actually works

Enterprise buyers rarely have one compliance problem. They have the same problem in seven legal entities, under overlapping frameworks, with one team answering for all of it. The question that decides whether a platform survives that is not how many frameworks it lists. It is whether an obligation can exist once and apply differently per entity, because that is what determines how much duplicated work your team does every quarter.

Ask this	Weak answer	What you want
How is an entity represented?	A tag, or a separate workspace per entity	A first-class object, so one control can be shared and one can be local
Can one control satisfy several frameworks?	Yes, by duplicating it under each framework	One control, many mappings, tested once and credited everywhere
Who can see what?	One global role model	Entity-scoped permissions, so a subsidiary controller sees only their scope
Does a rule change fan out?	A notification to an inbox	A change that names every affected entity, control and policy owner
How does the price scale?	Per entity, per framework, per user, stacked	One axis you can forecast, with the eighth entity costing less than the first

The pricing row is where multi-entity deals go wrong. Per-entity pricing sounds fair and behaves badly, because it charges you most in exactly the year you reorganize. If you are building a budget case, the recorded figures across this category sit on our compliance software pricing benchmark and the planned tiers are on pricing.

§ 114 Procurement

What an enterprise security review will ask us

A compliance platform sits next to your control documentation and your regulatory correspondence, so it gets reviewed harder than most tools of its size. We would rather state our position before launch than be vague about it in a questionnaire.

Where does the data live, and what leaves? Obligation and control metadata, not your general ledger. The architecture keeps the regulatory corpus separate from customer content, which is what lets the rule watching run without touching your records.
Are you SOC 2 certified? Nobody is, because SOC 2 certification does not exist. It is an attestation report from a licensed CPA firm covering a stated period. Ours is planned around launch, and until the report exists the honest answer is that it does not.
What happens to our register if we leave? Export of the obligation register, control mappings and the change history, in a format that opens without our software. A compliance record you cannot take with you is a retention problem, not a feature.
Who is accountable for a wrong answer? We cite a primary source on every obligation so you can check it. No platform, and no model, can occupy the compliance officer role: statute and rule assign that to a named person, which is covered in can AI replace a compliance officer.
How do we get our team onto it? Named onboarding, a migration of your existing register, and framework mapping done with you rather than handed over as a template. The GRC software page covers where this sits against the incumbent suites.

§ 90

Related registers

§ 99 · Final entry

Start the enterprise conversation

Request access with your company name, or email team@complianceofficer.ai. Security review materials are ready before launch; nothing is charged today.